Even Post Donald Trump, Trump’s Guerrilla Politics Will Remain

Ted Rall Trump Donald Trump guerrilla politics
Written by Ted Rall

The difference between Donald Trump and traditional politicians like Hillary Clinton? Trump intuitively grasps the way viewers in houses and apartments around the country perceive things on the idiot box …

aNewDomainTed Rall Donald Trump Hillary Clinton — Donald Trump is a cat with 12 or 13 lives.

This past weekend felt like August 1974. That was the month everyone knew Richard Nixon was toast. No one could know exactly how or exactly when he’d be forced out. But everyone knew it was coming.

After a video/audio recording of a 2005 “Access Hollywood” open mic of Donald Trump sharing his reality TV update of the medieval droit de seigneur surfaced on Friday before Sunday’s big second presidential debate, dozens of Republican lawmakers and senior officials abandoned ship.

All that remained, it seemed, was a Trumpian version of the GOP bigwigs who trudged to the White House ala ’74 to deliver the news that Dirty Donny could no longer count on Republican support in Congress.

Calling for the mass expulsion of 11 million people didn’t finish Trump. Demanding that Muslims be banned from entering the United States didn’t do it. Encouraging supporters to beat up protesters didn’t do it. Making fun of John McCain for being captured didn’t do it.

Bragging that he likes to grab women “by the p&%$$” — this, of all things, was his Waterloo.

Only it wasn’t.

The reason Trump is still in the race, merely wounded and behind (rather than humiliated and out), is important to note. It’s because novice politician understands media better than anyone else.

Normally, we’d expect the election to be a referendum on Hillary Clinton and by extension President Obama. She’s the incumbent effectively running for a third term of the same policies. Instead, everyone is talking about Donald Trump — his fitness or lack thereof, his authenticity or lack thereof, his sanity or lack thereof. The reason is simple: Hillary Clinton delivers a cut-and-paste stump speech at every appearance (except for those to Wall Street, where she likes to share her “private position”). Trump, meanwhile, performs jazz. He extemporizes.

Even his biggest detractors find the whole thing riveting — and fascinating to watch.

No one, including him, knows what he’s going to say. So every rally gets covered live. How can Clinton compete with this?

Throughout the campaign, Trump has neutralized the outrage over each of his scandalous utterances by supplanting it with a new one. The media, always lazy and now shorthanded, can’t keep up.

And each one makes him the center of the conversation.

Flooding the zone was the risky but brilliant tactic that Donald Trump, who seemed to be mortally wounded on Friday afternoon, deployed a couple hours before the debate. He called a press conference announcing that he had invited four women who have spent years at war with the Clintons over allegations of sexual harassment, rape andmaking light of her legal defense of a rapist to attend the debate.

I don’t blame the women for allowing themselves to be used this way. They’ve been marginalized and ridiculed, their stories never taken seriously by the news media. For them, tacky publicity is better than obscurity.

From a political standpoint, however, I thought it would be widely perceived as a cheap and disgusting Hail Mary pass by a desperate candidate hours away from being forced out of the race. Boy, was I wrong.

Thirty minutes into the debate, the megastory of the election season had been reduced one of numerous issues, washed away by Trump’s exercise of a nuclear option. Back to normalish: Hillary Clinton was on the defensive over her emails.

Hillary Clinton was in an impossible position. In politics, the cliché goes, when you are playing defense, you are losing. So she refused to defend herself or her husband. For viewers, however, the effect was to leave Trump’s “I may say bad things about women, but my opponent does bad things to them” argument unchallenged.

If this real estate thing doesn’t work out, Donald Trump can market himself as the brain behind the deftest crisis response in political history.

I’m still reeling.

The difference between traditional elites like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is that Trump intuitively grasps the way things get perceived on the idiot box in houses and apartments across the country. Clinton and the corporate media pundit class see Trump’s constant interruptions and interjections while others are speaking as rude and ridiculous. They’re right that it’s rude. But ridiculous? Well. It is ridiculously effective.

How many times have you seen the president or some other politician say something, and you wanted to or actually did shout “liar!” or “wrong” at the TV?  Trump does that for you. Trump has revolutionized political discourse as radically as “cowardly” American colonists did when they shot from behind rocks and trees at British troops lined up in formation, the way armies were “supposed” to fight. You don’t have to like it. But that’s the way it is.

No matter what happens in November, the guerrilla politics pioneered by Trump are here to stay.

For aNewDomain Politics, I’m Ted Rall. 

Ted Rall is a political essayist and cartoonist here at aNewDomain. He also is the author of “Trump: A Graphic Biography,” an examination of the life of the Republican presidential nominee in comics form. Please support Ted by sponsoring his work on Patreon.)

Cover image: CNN.com, All Rights Reserved.