Tom Sloan Cartoon: Evolution or Creationism

Man and Woman Kit - is it evolution or creationism?
Written by Tom Sloan

The man and woman kit — is it evolution or creationism?

aNewDomain — Order your very own Man and Woman Kit NOW while supplies last! Only $29.99 plus shipping and handling. A $100 value! That’s dirt cheap! For the first fifty orders, we will double your order. That’s TWO kits for just $59.98 (you pay additional shipping and processing fee). Be the first kid on your block to start an instant family. Easy to follow instructions. 100% Risk (will only work if instructions are followed exactly — money-back not guaranteed).

Is it evolution or creationism? You be the judge. Don’t be fooled by cheap imitations. Each kit can create one man and one woman. Don’t be left out. Act now!

Cartoons150 Evolution or Creationism

Cartoon: “Evolution or Creationism?” by

Just send cash or check to: Dr. Hydrogen, 33.3 Forrest Dr. Bamboozle, PA 60909

For aNewDomain, I’m .

1 Comment

  • The carton may be funny but what is serious is that we teach evolution to students in the classroom as a scientific fact – when the scientific evidence condemns it.

    Darwinian/Macro evolution can be stated simply as the following equation:

    Simple beginning (e.g. 1 primitive cell = no brain, no nervous system, etc.)
    + lots of time
    + lots natural selection
    + many mutations
    + natural forces (rain, wind, gravity etc.)
    extremely complex organism
    (e.g. human, brain, blood circulatory system)

    Has this been observed? – NO (Even Richard Dawkins agrees with this)
    Is it plausible? -Not really ; There is no proof that it is.
    Does it need a lot of faith to believe this? – Certainly does

    So why do we teach it as a scientific fact?

    The consequences of teaching Darwinina/Macro evolution as a scientific fact are subtle but very destructive.

    The core assertion of Darwinian/Macro evolution, that from simple and chaotic beginnings all life-forms emerged by an unguided, purposeless process, is NOT harmless. The inescapable inference is that since we emerged from a random, unguided, purposeless process, then we are purposeless and of no inherent value. This has a subtle but very negative impact on the self esteem of students and is contributing to low self esteem, depression, nihilism, etc.

    If the scientific evidence for macro evolution was genuinely strong; I would not complain. The truth is that the scientific evidence shows that macro evolution is highly implausible