Super Bowl 2013 Ads Cost More than Linebacker? — What’s a better investment? Super Bowl 2013 ads for your product or a winning quarterback for a team you just happen to own? Seriously.

One thing to note: Super Bowl 2013 ads cost an astronomical amount and the ad prices are rising faster than even player salaries. This sheds a lot of light on the power of media in the sports world.

Check out the chart below. The cost of a Super Bowl 2013 ad is rising meteorically — surpassing the growth of astronomic player salaries? What is up with that? Consider this: Only six 49ers and just four Ravens even will make enough in salary this season — this is after taxes — to even be able to afford to buy a Super Bowl 2013 ad.
Super Bowl 2013 Ads Infographic credit: Jess3

Click here for our John C. Dvorak’s controversial deep dive into offensive strategies he says NFL teams ought to adopt. The pistol spread, anyone?

Click here to check out NFL Super Bowl seeding techniques and a history of seeding versus wins. It’s telling — great piece by our sports fanatic David Street.

For, I’m Gina Smith. Go Niners : )  But may the best team win.

, , , , ,

2 Responses to Super Bowl 2013 Ads Cost More than Linebacker?

  1. Ant Pruitt February 2, 2013 at 8:29 am #

    Sorry, i gotta side with the Ravens and Ray Lewis this time.

    -RAP, II


  1. Too many bad commercials - February 25, 2014

    […] — Who watches TV for the commercials? No one, unless its the Super Bowl or the Winter Olympics. As a rule commercials are lousy. There are countless commercials that are […]

Leave a Reply

Thanks for visiting.